Mokros, Andreas Habermeyer, Elmar Poeppl, Timm B. Santtila, Pekka Ziogas, Anastasios 2022 As authors of the Target Article (Ziogas et al., 2020), we would like to thank all fve colleagues who were so kind as to comment on our article. We are feeling fattered by their kindness, impressed by their thoroughness, and inspired by their invaluable suggestions on how to move on from here. First, we would like to address each Commentary in turn, in alphabetical order, trying to summarize its main gist, and refect upon our review accordingly. Second, in doing so, we want to add a few thoughts on the backdrop against which the “Tower of Babel” was erected, as Pfaus (2021) put it. Third, we would like to emphasize some particular recommendations on behalf of the commentators on how our feld might move forward productively. application/pdf https://n2t.net/ark:/51647/srd1324083 https://sonar.unidistance.ch/global/documents/324083 https://sonar.unidistance.ch/documents/324083/files/s10508-022-02496-0.pdf eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10508-022-02496-0 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/ark/51647/srd1324083 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC BY Sexual arousal, Electrophysiology, Sexuality, Neuroelectricity, Sexual preference Tower of Babel or Lighthouse? The State of Research on Neuroelectric Correlates of Human Sexuality: A Response to the Commentaries http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501